|
17222. wabbit - 10/25/2005 7:27:34 PM Since it's a made-up word anyway, why not combine the author's word with scylla ... klascyll, klascylla, scyllbauter, bauterscyll, that kind of thing. 17231. concerned - 10/26/2005 3:55:48 AM Back again with late breaking job related announcements:
Last week, the guy who 'masterminded' the latest generation redesign of our accelerator personnel (200% over budget & schedule, 30% of promised performance) safety system was trying to design warning signs for experimental station ingress/egress points. He had selected incandescent bulbs to light these signs. In all his genius, he had not once considered what a maintenance nightmare supporting a couple thousand of these glow bulbs would be once implemented. Better yet, he had miscalculated their current draw by a factor of 10. So he had to back off of that turkey. I didn't say anything. Not officially my project, although I had been talked about wrt implementing these things, thus giving me an official interest.
His next stunt was to propose $250 of electroluminescent backlights for each sign (although not publicly). When I found out, I could resist responding no longer. I pointed out in an email that I distributed to line management (of the fuckwit 'let's fire concerned' 'cause we don't like him much obsession) that I could design and implement, for a fifth of that cost an LED implementation that would last longer, be more reliable, be brighter and look much, much cooler, saving our allegedly cash strapped department $50,000 to $100,000. I have incontestible experience successfully designing complex circuitry that works on the first pass (as opposed to this fairly simple but redundant application).
It is a measure of the fucktard pighead mindset of the APS line management I report to that there has not been any interest expressed in my positive and proactive suggestion.
17233. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:13:42 AM I should note that I have just come off a completely successful demonstration of my latest design with the beamline user I had previously made reference to who has associations with Stanford and IIT. I was actually restraining his enthusiasm, reminding him that, although the design fully performed as promised on the first pass, there was still some parametric and stress testing, plus a few circuit tweaks that I wanted to explore to further enhance performance.
Keep in mind that this was the *first pass* of a one hundred component circuit design. IOW, it was virtually right out of my head and Digi-Key's order sheet onto a research beamline with millions of dollars riding on the result. Yes, I wanted to exercise due engineering care, regardless of the initial success of my design. Plus, the user claims that he will post the design on the research intranet, so I want to make sure I've put in some effort to optimize the circuit before officially releasing it.
So, there's an example of what I'm facing: calumny from those who are having difficulty designing lighting fixtures, praise from serious physicists and university and corporately funded research groups. I believe I have earned the right to be acerbic and critical of self aggrandizing fools. 17237. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:29:38 AM This all may sound 'flaky', SL and others, but it's all true. Looks to me like mid management wagon circling over the discredited idea that I don't deliver promised goods. Hell yeah they want me out of Argonne. 17238. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:31:02 AM To cover their pathetic lame asses. 17240. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:31:47 AM To cover their pathetic lame asses. 17241. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:34:03 AM I can give names, but I won't for now. I'm not afraid to have my every claim checked on, if it comes to that.
Just remember that. 17245. concerned - 10/26/2005 4:48:36 AM Perhaps you might want to contribute to the "Help Concerned Deal with His Work Attitude Issue" fund. It's easy and it's fun. Just wager substantial monies that what I post regarding isn't based on fact, and you'll wind up giving me my early retirement nestegg. 17270. alistairconnor - 10/26/2005 6:06:17 PM It hasn't officially been announced, but Wabbit has done a huge job of making the Mote's archived threads available again. They are linked from the "Mote Archive page", by a link called "More archived threads"
This brings you to this menu ... which contains a colossal amount of half-forgotten treasures [if you don't mind wading through the usual shite to get to them!] 17271. PelleNilsson - 10/26/2005 8:50:13 PM I was going to announce in Cal's place, TPW, that the archive is back up, but IndianaJones (now Nicholas Kronos was quicker. 17272. jayackroyd - 10/27/2005 2:49:16 AM [chuckle] 17273. Macnas - 10/27/2005 11:01:00 AM I just took a look-see a second ago.
At TPW I mean, nostalgic list making and unpleasant posturing from RDB and PM. Still, nice to see the old names still posting and doing their thing.
17274. Magoseph - 10/27/2005 3:00:52 PM Yes, it is, Mac. Good afternoon.
17275. Macnas - 10/27/2005 3:56:01 PM Howdy. 17276. Ms. No - 10/27/2005 5:50:34 PM Since there seems to be a break now I'm going to move the Econ discussion over to the Slow Thread and then link it in the news bar so it'll be easy to find for those participating. 17277. Magoseph - 10/27/2005 6:06:39 PM Too bad--it really elevated the contents of this thread. 17278. Ms. No - 10/27/2005 6:30:52 PM I moved it so it would be more easily found later. I'd have made a "conversation" link, but I've never had much luck with them. 17279. Magoseph - 10/27/2005 6:40:17 PM Thank you for mentioning that the conversation started in the Cafe--I was afraid that people would be discouraged from starting new topics in this thread.
Having conversation links here seem like a good idea. 17280. Ms. No - 10/27/2005 6:44:08 PM Well, sure. I've asked AC about the conversation tool. I may be using it incorrectly. 17281. judithathome - 10/28/2005 4:41:03 PM So, how is everyone on this beautiful Indictment Friday?
|
