|
5018. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 4:17:46 PM Better source on Landis.
I am to wonder... the human body is a wierd machine. Who knows what an adrenaline dump does to your blood chemistry.
5019. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 4:18:40 PM Another velonews article.
5020. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 4:29:02 PM Only thing that seems fishy is that a front-runner would know they're going to be tested every step of the way... so I don't understand why they would risk it.
We've already seen questionable sample handling by these testing facilities.
Who to trust? 5021. alistairconnor - 7/27/2006 4:55:18 PM Well, let's just say Floyd is a ballsy kind of guy.
He's certainly got 100% more balls than Lance. 5022. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 4:56:48 PM If he's taking testosterone... maybe not the sperm-count. 5023. alistairconnor - 7/27/2006 5:08:45 PM Well, the obvious answer as to why he would risk it is... he had just lost the race in the previous stage, and he's unlikely to ever get a better shot at winning the Tour... hip replacement and all that... and maybe it won't be detected, and maybe they won't dare declare the result if it is...
Back in the dark ages of the 80s, Pedro Delgado tested positive for something or other, while he had the yellow jersey, or possibly with a delay like this time, after he had just won the Tour. They checked his B sample and well gee, turns out he hadn't taken dope after all. No really.
It's hard to see why anyone in the cycling world would be gunning for Floyd in particular, to the extent of falsifying a positive test. Lance had enemies, some zealous officials might have tried to frame him because he was so obviously guilty and so very good at covering his tracks. But the cycling world is in convalescence after the pre-Tour drama, nobody is going to be looking for trouble.
But nobody is going to be let off the hook unduly, this time. 5024. PelleNilsson - 7/27/2006 6:15:35 PM So it seems we boring old cynics may have been right after all. 5025. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 6:24:56 PM Win the battle... lose the war. 5026. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 8:06:40 PM Best response seen on any TDF discussion so far...
"This is bogus. Any level of testosterone would be considered high in France."
lol 5027. alistairConnor - 7/27/2006 8:07:38 PM I think it's the other way round.
This is a painful but necessary stage. For too long, the sporting authorities have closed their eyes to doping.
For years they were in a bind, the characteristic dope being EPO which was not detectable. So all they could do was disqualify riders who had an EPO-induced hematocrite level of over 50 (which is not naturally possible) and rubber-stamp the others who had a level of 49...
Then France cracked down on dope (a courageous stance by the minister of sports at the time). It has taken five years for Spain and Italy to catch up, but they now seem to be serious about it too. It is no longer business as usual, now the riders just have to understand and accept the new rules. The "open" era is over. I hope.
It also appears that detection technology is catching up, and there is less of a lag between new doping methods and the means of detecting it. This is mostly a matter of resources and will on the part of the sporting authorities. 5028. alistairConnor - 7/27/2006 8:11:21 PM "I think it's the other way round"
was in response to
"Win the battle... lose the war"
I'm sure it'll take a while to change the mentalities of the riders.
... but yes, that's a good one iii... what a load of bollocks.
But your Greek chorus of boring old cynics are wrong, Pelle. 5029. alistairConnor - 7/27/2006 8:23:52 PM Going back a couple of weeks :
Sunday 16th. World Cup final is scheduled to start at 8 pm.
1 pm : my team of valiant cyclists gets off the TGV, after a four hour journey from Lyon, in Rennes. That's about 80 km from our hostel for that evening. I hadn't anticipated the additional time constraint when planning the stage -- I was counting on the long summer evenings to get us home OK without stress.
So it turned into an epic. Particularly as it wasn't as simple as just riding up the main road. Oh no, that would be too easy. There had to be forest paths, dirt tracks, preferably a bit of mud. After all, this is a mountain bike expedition.
The irony is that I was the weakest link in the team of eight. The average age is about 10 years older than me, and 10 kilos heavier too; but these guys had been training for months. I just arrived, grinning, with my rusty bike... and discovered that the magic of eternal youth is wearing thin. At 45, I was suffering well before the end of the stage, just short of cramp, and not capable of going any faster...
We got there at 8.05, just in time to see the incident that led to the first penalty.
Such dramatic viewing conditions generally lead to a French win, in my experience. But Materazzi was going to fix that...
I had arranged for a TV to be available at the hostel.
5030. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 9:46:50 PM Unfortunately, no respect for the mom.
And Floyd denies it of course....
According to him, "Hundreds" of cyclists have had elevated levels of testosterone. There are a myriad of explanations... I don't know enough about the endocrine system to say one way or the other.
Oh well. 5031. iiibbb - 7/27/2006 9:50:32 PM I will say that I love cycling... especially the tour de france... and I want to believe Floyd too. 5032. alistairConnor - 7/27/2006 11:06:20 PM Excellent article. I want to believe Floyd too.
"You put a standard testosterone patch that is used for male hormone-replacement therapy on your scrotum and leave it there for about six hours. The small dose is not sufficient to produce a positive urine result in the doping test, but the body actually recovers faster."
Hmm... Must try that. 5033. wonkers2 - 7/28/2006 12:01:42 AM Cap'n Dirty sez, "He probably ran into one a them French ladies the night before the test. They'll raise yer testtosterone every time." 5034. iiibbb - 7/28/2006 2:32:02 AM More from Floyd plus other tidbits.
-------------------------------------
Under World Anti-Doping Agency regulations, a ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone greater than 4:1 is considered a positive result and subject to investigation. The threshold was recently lowered from 6:1. The most likely natural ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone in humans is 1:1.
Testosterone is included as an anabolic steroid on WADA’s list of banned substances, and its use can be punished by a two-year ban.
Testosterone can build muscle and improve recovery time when used over a period of several weeks, said Dr. Gary Wadler, a member of the World Anti-Doping Agency and a spokesman for the American College of Sports Medicine. But if Landis had been a user, his earlier urine tests during the tour would have been affected, he said.
“So something’s missing here,” Wadler said. “It just doesn’t add up.” 5035. iiibbb - 7/28/2006 2:56:14 AM Boulder Report
This guy wrote a bunch of stuff on doping after Tyler Hamilton. 5036. iiibbb - 7/28/2006 3:08:19 AM 1 - from Tim Church: The volume of testing itself on such an elite segment of the population can and will skew the quantity of false-positives. So if the chances for a false positive are 1 in 100 for the gen. pop., the chances for this specific segment would arguably be much higher, like 15 to 20%. However, no one has actually studied these riders, their hormones, the down-to-the-minute blood variations that can occur over the course of 3 weeks to the extent that is necessary to come up with adequate values and determinations. Summary: the test validity can be questioned, the method of test application can be questioned, and there are more times than the testers would like to admit where they'll get a result and won't have a clue about how that result occurred. When questioned, they get defensive....
2) Dr. Conrad Earnest - It's physically impossible, even with doping or masking methods, to read "Low, low, low, low, low, HIGH, low, low, low" for T/E ratios over a course of days and be guilty of a patch, a cream, or an injection... We can assume Floyd was tested daily, by the UCI as well as Phonak's own doctors (can't trust the NGB - see TH). Floyd would have had to have shown at least two or three values above the threshold for two or three days for more questions to arise. He's only allegedly tested positive for one sample on one day...
3) Dr. Ben Levine, MD - Dick Pound is NOT the person to be leading the charge against doping in this or any sport. Granted, it's a thankless job, but going on NPR to announce your disappointment in a rider without all the facts (ed. think Hamilton), is another example of several ethical lapses for which he is guilty. Testosterone application on THAT stage would have been pointless, so the rider and his consultants need to point out the trend and highlight any spike or dip-anomalies. 5037. alistairconnor - 7/28/2006 9:46:35 AM The defensive stuff you have posted contains a number of strawmen.
Firstly, the idea that testosterone can only be effective over the long term, from this guy Wadler in the ESPN article, is contradicted by the practice of some cyclists (why would they do it if it didn't work?) and by the opinion of other docs : From the
Sports Illustrated article you posted just before;
"You can do a hard Alpine stage without doping. But after that, the muscles are exhausted. You need -- depending on your training conditions -- up to three days in order to regenerate."
To help recover, testosterone and human growth hormone can be used. "Both are made by the body and are therefore natural substances," he said. "They help to build muscle as well as in muscle recovery." Dr. Moosburger explained how it was done. "You put a standard testosterone patch that is used for male hormone-replacement therapy on your scrotum and leave it there for about six hours. The small dose is not sufficient to produce a positive urine result in the doping test, but the body actually recovers faster."
There is another strawman in the Boulder Report :
(However, it’s inconceivable that testosterone, even if it was taken, could alone account for Floyd’s performance on stage 17; testosterone aids in recovery and the ability to sustain higher training loads, but won’t allow a rider to ride faster simply on its own.)
No-one would suggest such a thing. Floyd's comeback was an incredible performance, whether or not he got a little hormonal help.
If the B sample gives the same result for the T/E ratio, there are a whole bunch of other tests that could show conclusively what's up. The positive test, in itself, shows an abnormally high ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone. That indicates clearly that the testosterone detected was not produced by the body (unless someone can show how an unnatural ratio like that can occur naturally).
Next questions :
* first, was his testosterone LEVEL (as distinct from the t/e ratio) actually abnormally high, i.e. well out of line with the level in his other daily tests? If it wasn't, that would greatly increase the chances that it's a false positive (if the testosterone level wasn't higher on that day, then there would be no recovery benefit for him anyway).
* secondly, there are apparently tests which can distinguish between natural and synthetic testosterone. So it would be possible to show conclusively whether the (presumably) abnormally high testosterone was artificial or not.
It really looks to me like Floyd, desperately needing to recover his strength after his disastrous stage, decided to take a huge risk. Gambling that it wouldn't be detected, or that it would be hushed up.
Here's some technical detail on the Spanish scandal that cleaned out the favourites (Ulrich, Botero, Basso, Sevilla etc) before the Tour. Useful background. Indicates that, as one suspected, it's the teams that have been paying for the sophisticated blood doping efforts for all the top riders. I suspect we're now back to an era where it'll be individual riders deciding to take risks or not, on their own responsibility. The sponsors will no longer cover this shit if the risk of bad publicity is high.
|
