540. ChristiPeters - 10/28/1999 11:26:17 PM
Whoops! too big!
541. ChristiPeters - 10/28/1999 11:34:47 PM
I'm SORRY! Can someone please delete my post#539?
542. ChristiPeters - 10/28/1999 11:42:32 PM
OK, let's see if I can do this right. This is Rose at 5 months old, still in her puppy fuzz:
543. Dusty - 10/28/1999 11:43:25 PM
ChristiPeters
Remember to add the Width command, with a value no larger than 425 (to preserve the margins)
544. ChristiPeters - 10/28/1999 11:43:50 PM
Well! That's better!
(BTW thanks to whoever deleted my mistake!)
545. Dusty - 10/28/1999 11:45:40 PM
Much better, and a cute picture.
548. PsychProf - 10/28/1999 11:58:28 PM
Christi...why not test in the dust mode?
549. Dusty - 10/29/1999 12:01:51 AM
This is Cleo the Huntress, Empress of the Universe and In Charge of It All:
550. Dusty - 10/29/1999 12:03:57 AM
ChristiPeters
As PP suggests, if you check for dust, you will see whether it works before posting.
Your error was putting quotes around the width value.
You want:
Width=300
Not
Width="300"
551. Dusty - 10/29/1999 12:06:00 AM
ChristiPeters
As PP suggests, if you check for dust, you will see whether it works before posting.
Your error was putting quotes around the width value.
You want:
Width=300
Not
Width="300"
552. ChristiPeters - 10/29/1999 12:11:01 AM
OH!
(Christi smacks her already too flat forehead)
Thanks Dusty!
I did Check for Dust, but wasn't sure if the pictures were coming out with the under construction icon because they were messed up or because they weren't supposed to show up there.
Now I know!
(Can we say "DUH!"?)
&:oD
553. ChristiPeters - 10/29/1999 12:17:54 AM
This is Blacky, Furniture Decorator and Contortionist Extraordinaire:
554. ChristiPeters - 10/29/1999 12:19:04 AM
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
555. ChristiPeters - 10/29/1999 12:19:51 AM
Well! Gee! I could swear! I did it the same both times!
556. Dusty - 10/29/1999 12:39:44 AM
ChristiPeters
It took me a minute to figure it out: one has angelfire, the other anglefire.
557. Dusty - 10/29/1999 12:40:34 AM
I'll delete it, but after a bit, in case you want to look at the source.
558. joezan - 10/29/1999 3:27:44 PM
Well, dang it!...now I'm curious. Was anyone able to load my .mpe file in 529 or 537? It takes awhile to load, but it's still working for me, every time.
559. proudnerd - 10/29/1999 3:35:34 PM
joezan,
Both 529 and 537 worked fine. FYI, I am using Netscape on linux and MpegTV mpeg player.
