|
6766. wonkers2 - 3/21/2007 4:44:07 PM For temesis--Are you getting your "fair" share of this loot? Pharmaceutical companies bribing our doctors 6767. wonkers2 - 3/23/2007 4:01:54 PM Diagnosis as Art, Not Rocket Science 6768. judithathome - 3/23/2007 8:34:48 PM One or two pieces of toast and a lot of vegetables and salads.
Wonk, try Pepperidge Farms Very Thin sliced breads...two of them are about 18 grams of carbs and 80 calories. (A serving is 3 slices but I always do only two...brings the numbers down that way and is still satisfying.) Toasted, they give you that crunch and a bread fix without a lot of damage to your numbers. 6769. wonkers2 - 3/24/2007 3:02:10 AM That makes a lot of sense. It's amazing that for the past couple of weeks we've been buying unsliced bread from Breadsmith, a local franchise bakery, and slicing it thinner ourselves. That way I can still have two slices for breakfast and a grapefruit. How does that sound? 6770. judithathome - 3/24/2007 7:35:22 AM Sounds great! I like my toast very crunchy and with this thin stuff, it's perfection every time. I can't stand a piece of toast that is limp and chewy. 6771. wonkers2 - 3/24/2007 2:47:52 PM Same here. 6772. thoughtful - 3/24/2007 3:41:42 PM great ideas...but make sure you're eating whole grain breads...far healthier than the white stuff.
I so enjoy whole grain breads now that I skip the white stuff even in restaurants...tastes like eating paper and it isn't the least bit filling or worth the calories.
We've been making our own homemade graham crackers and they are wonderful. They are crispy and chewy at the same time. Easy to make with honey and molasses...yum and no trans fats. 6773. judithathome - 3/24/2007 4:01:52 PM Yes, I thought "whole grains" was a given...can't imagine eating white bread myself, either.
However, I will do it at restaurants...our fave Italian place makes THE best garlic yeast rolls and I always have one even though I know it's "waisted" calories. 6774. judithathome - 3/24/2007 4:03:09 PM Wonks, I can't recall if you are on cholesterol meds or not but I am and mine had a warning that I not consume grapefruit at all. 6775. wonkers2 - 3/26/2007 1:58:29 PM Insurance companies make money by not paying claims So what else is new? 6776. robertjayb - 3/26/2007 5:45:22 PM Drugs for "good" cholesterol fail tests...(NYTimes)
NEW ORLEANS (AP) -- The hot new strategy of trying to prevent heart disease by raising good cholesterol had more setbacks Monday as new studies showed that experimental drugs didn't work and also had safety problems.
The news follows Pfizer Inc.'s abandonment in December of an $800 million investment in torcetrapib, the leading contender in this class of drugs, because it raised the risk of heart attacks and deaths.
Heart specialists have been anxious to know whether the problems extend to all such drugs and doom this approach.
6777. thoughtful - 3/26/2007 6:02:58 PM won't be long before they figure out that reducing cholesterol is not the way to avoid heart attacks...
I'm keeping hubby on the statins though since I read that they can postpone the onset of dementia... 6778. wonkers2 - 3/26/2007 11:20:32 PM Your point on cholesterol differs from what I've read and been told by my internist. What do you base it on? 6779. thoughtful - 3/27/2007 2:08:10 PM Uh oh...do we really want to start another 'global warming like' discussion here? Where you can tell me I'm in the pocket of the gopers? Or i must work for wesson or crisco? Or that I'm in denial or insane or just plain stupid? All because I'm not willing to accept the "low fat" paradigm as the be all and end all to a healthy heart and a long life? Because I don't drink the kool-aid and keep an open mind and recognize that science is not only all one way but often results in conflicting data and that science also frequently reverses itself as more data comes to light.
But we've been through all that.
But since you asked, I base this on the fact that
- multiple studies have shown the atkins diet which includes lots of fat but restricted carbs results in the best cholesterol profile of participants as well as the greatest weight loss
- 50% of women who have heart attacks have acceptable cholesterol levels
- the 'new' syndrome x which relates high blood pressure with diabetes and fat around the abdomen also greatly increases the risk of heart disease. Other studies have shown strong relationship between abdominal fat and risk of heart disease.
- cholesterol is an essential element the body requires to make necessary digestive biles and to support cell walls
- 80% of the cholesterol in your body is made by the liver and diet accounts for the minority of cholesterol in your system. Further if you eat less saturated fat, your body will make more. That's why many people will find that even with low fat dieting, they may reduce their cholesterol at first, but then it will start to rise again. That your cholesterol levels are largely genetically determined.
- the body lays down plaque in arteries because of inflammation and inflammation is triggered by excess insulin
- high carb intake leads the body to convert the sugars into fat immediately if it's not burned off in order to protect the brain from excess glucose, and that this fat is largely laid in around the abdomen
I could go on, but you get the idea. The cardiac guys need to start listening more to the endocrinologists who understand the impact of insulin on the body. In excess it can be very damaging, and they are only beginning to learn how damaging it can be.
But of course, this requires breaking paradigms and a whole nutrition machine (which has been politicized by everyone from the beef growers to the sugar growers to the corn lobby) to eat a low fat diet where the fats are replaced with sugar and the mainstream medical community is left scratching their heads as to why diabetes and heart disease are now epidemic.
If you want to learn more about insulin and its impact on the body, I recommend reading "The Schwarzbein Principle". While I don't support her hormone replacement therapy at this point, the rest of her program makes incredible sense.6780. thoughtful - 3/27/2007 2:30:05 PM Consider your typical 'healthy' american breakfast. It is nothing but a total sugar load, so everyone starts their day with a sugar high and insulin rush.
orange juice
Raisin bran
Skim milk
banana
coffee
You're looking at about 85 grams of sugar or about 21 teaspoons, depending on if you add milk and sugar to your coffee.
6781. alistairconnor - 3/27/2007 2:45:50 PM Makes sense to me Tful... I have been suspicious of the cholesterol cult for decades.
Well anyway, you're telling me what I want to hear. I've been feeling a bit uneasy that since I went back to eating meat a couple of years ago, I may be overdosing on animal fats... I like the message that it's all good except the sugar/carbs. 6782. thoughtful - 3/27/2007 6:53:13 PM Knock me over with a feather!!!
This paradigm, I can break, but not the global warming one.
OK.
Since you're willing to listen, I'll give you a little more.
Don't worry about saturated fat. Rather avoid transfats like the plague. They are sand in the gears of the body. When it comes to fat, it's more important to get a balance of fats including your monounsaturated (olive oil) and your omega-3s (fish oil and flax seed oil and walnuts). These are essential fatty acids (essential meaning the body can't make them out of other things).
Eat adequate protein...6-8 ozs per day for the average woman; 10-12 ozs per day for the average man...it's necessary to build muscle.
Adjust your carb intake to control your weight. Eat good carbs not bad carbs...brown rice and whole wheat bread and starchy vegetables like sweet potatoes or acorn squash are good carbs...chocolate cake, cheetos, and french fries are bad carbs. Remember all carbs get converted to sugar so your body doesn't care if it comes in a grape or tostitos chip. Only difference is the nutritional content that comes with the carb. But a grape can raise blood sugar just like a cookie, and should be counted as carbs. Milk which is full of lactose is a carb.
Balance your meals. Every meal should consist of a fat, a protein, a carb, and a nonstarchy vegetable. This will limit the sugar shock from the carb and make sure you are getting a full complement of nutrients. Nonstarchy vegetables are especially important as they a) are low calorie but filling b) add a lot of necessary fiber c) are nutrition powerhouses which help fight cancer, add anti-oxidants to eliminate free radicals and much more. Further, balance your snacks. Better to eat a handful of walnuts with an apple than to have just an apple...the walnuts add fat (omega-3) and protein, slowing down digestion and minimizing sugar shock from the carbs in the apple.
Drink lots of water. Avoid processed foods and chemicals and excess salt. Eat what comes naturally...what you can fish, farm, pick, milk, etc. Don't eat stuff your ancestors wouldn't recognize. Cheese does not come in cans. Fruit does not come in rolls.
6783. thoughtful - 3/27/2007 6:55:07 PM BTW, when I was in wyoming a couple of years ago, I struck up a conversation with a biochemist about this diet stuff and he was surprised at what I was telling him as he said that's what the biochemical science is discovering and that medical science hasn't caught up with them yet...he said I was very leading edge.
Maybe so too with the global warming, eh? 6784. alistairConnor - 3/27/2007 8:23:40 PM Well, I come from a medical family that has a strong sceptical streak. I have enough scientific training to know to take nothing on faith; when in doubt, I need to understand enough of the premises of the question to at least work out who I can trust. I have done enough biochem to know that the medical profession has been driving blind and bluffing a great deal. I have always been inclined to pay attention to folk remedies and wisdom in health matters, and to mistrust or question the verdict of the medical orthodoxy. My family doctor does homeopathy. I understand the power structures of the medical profession, where the vested interests of high priesthood and drug companies rule the roost.
None of this applies to global warming. Eminent scientists have been howling in the wilderness for twenty or thirty years. As Gandhi said, first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you... The power structures -- politicians and economic interests -- have fought them tooth and nail. In the last year or two, they have gained a wider audience because the evidence stacks up. The power structures have at least feigned acceptance... all the better to regroup and resist implementation of the necessary changes...
Apart from that, it's a really close analogy, Tful!
But... follow the money eh? 6785. wonkers2 - 3/28/2007 12:17:03 AM Thanks, thoughtful! Like alistaire, I find you more credible on diet than climate.
|
