|
683. CalGal - 11/29/1999 11:11:46 AM Nos,
I think you are a pathetic, mewling little putz and you're fucking up the Spiritual Issues thread. That is utterly irrelevant to whether or not a host can delete posts. 684. Nostradamus - 11/29/1999 11:16:44 AM Cal
Well, I don't blame you for feeling that way. I've said some pretty awful things about you. Never accuse me of not being able to take a punch, though, okay? Oof.
==):-) 685. ee - 11/29/1999 5:23:12 PM wrt the demon post:
Book of Revelation chapter 13
17
And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
18
Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
686. TrialShark - 11/29/1999 5:28:22 PM
ee --
Is that what the "666" thing is all about?
I always thought it was an obscure reference to the number of letters in each of Ronald Wilson Reagan's names. 687. ee - 11/29/1999 5:34:32 PM In the movie End of Days the deal was that you had to turn it upside down to get 999 as in 1999 688. ee - 11/29/1999 5:36:06 PM Maybe Ahhrnold is really Reagan 689. Dusty - 11/29/1999 11:16:20 PM CalGal
That being said, I thought it was a stupid thing to do.
Really? Why?
Did you think you and PE spitting at each other was relevant to this thread?
If your spat was worth saving, say the word and I'll copy it to the Playpen.
If moving asinine posts out of a thread doesn't fit your paradigm, please explain (but in the proper thread, please) 690. Dusty - 11/29/1999 11:18:02 PM To all
This is one of the first threads new people visit when they come to the Mote. Can we at least try to put on a pleasant face, so we don't turn off new people before they get settled in?
691. ScottLoar - 11/29/1999 11:22:23 PM But of course. I myself promise to practice here an ebullience calculated to coat the wary antennae with a slathering of great cheer and fraternity.
Here, that is, no other thread. 692. CalGal - 11/29/1999 11:26:40 PM Dusty,
Why on earth did you post further on it in here? Then if I respond, you've got more arguing to wail about. Honestly, people are clueless sometimes. I gave you my opinion.
And your Rodney King act is less than inspiring. 693. CalGal - 11/29/1999 11:28:43 PM Besides, it was hardly a spitting fight. It was actually rather funny. For you to delete it was only indication that you felt the need to (gack) make a statement and nothing else. I am unimpressed.
But--as I said--it is your thread. So don't ask for opinions and you won't have anything to worry about. 694. Indiana Jones - 11/29/1999 11:29:27 PM Try the Mote!
Where the dames are better looking and friendlier, Gillette manufractures the Mach 3 wits, and all posts are above average. 695. ElliottRW - 11/30/1999 5:54:29 AM
How's that sound?696. dusty - 11/30/1999 8:57:17 AM ElliottRW
Just a warning. Some people don't like incorporating sound into posts. In order to avoid offending, you might consider using a link, so that people can choose whether they want to hear a sound.
697. ElliottRW - 11/30/1999 11:26:44 PM dusty
Okay. Thanks for the tip. 698. Indiana Jones - 12/1/1999 7:23:04 AM 699. ChristinO - 12/1/1999 7:25:55 AM hmmmm......this strange border anomally just happened over in current events as well.
Both Indy and cazart came over from TT right? Maybe it's a difference in the way we do HTML? 700. Indiana Jones - 12/1/1999 7:27:29 AM I was duplicating cazart's feat. As I suspected, he left off the close quote on the URL in his link. 701. IdiotWind - 12/1/1999 10:21:25 PM This is the HTML language for linking, yes?
The Mote702. Dusty - 12/1/1999 10:24:19 PM IdiotWind ??
|
