|
10736. judithathome - 2/25/2013 7:39:59 PM Ummmm....I was referring to post# 10732. 10737. Ms. No - 3/1/2013 11:19:12 PM Rachel Maddow To Jon Stewart: Justice Scalia Is A ‘Troll Who Loves To Make People Mad’
Scroll down for the two-part video. The first one is real and funny, the second one is real and sobering as hell. 10738. judithathome - 3/1/2013 11:33:16 PM I'm taping the show this afternoon on the re-run...we always watch it a day late.
I love Maddow...can't fault her accomplishments: Rhodes scholar, etc. 10739. Jenerator - 3/4/2013 6:55:37 PM She's no Scalia. You may dislike his politics, but the man is truly a legal genius.
I can't stand Maddow - she and Maher make Cornell look bad. 10740. judithathome - 3/4/2013 7:55:00 PM Thank god she's no Scalia.
Of course, she's not supposed to be...she's a news person and Bill Maher is an entertainer. They aren't writing opinions for the Supreme Court though I don't doubt they'd be a tad more thoughtful than Scalia.
So...if we're comparing apples to apples, who do you think does a better job than Rachel Maddow?
10741. Jenerator - 3/4/2013 8:49:01 PM I'd say Laura Ingraham has every bit the impressive educuation that Maddow has and is less shrill.
When listening to a talk show host or political commentor, I want less outrage and more of an objective analysis.
Maddow has no respect for Scalia (he's a man and a conservative - two strikes) and it's no surprise. Though I think she would agree with many of his positions (reasonable search, etc.). 10742. Jenerator - 3/4/2013 8:49:53 PM I agree with Mark levin's positions a lot of the time, but I cannot stand listening to him. 10743. arkymalarky - 3/4/2013 9:11:40 PM Rachel Maddow is shrill? I must say that's the first time I've ever heard that criticism of her 10744. arkymalarky - 3/4/2013 9:13:08 PM Ingraham is a Rhodes Scholar? 10745. judithathome - 3/4/2013 9:31:56 PM Maddow earned a degree in public policy from Stanford in 1994. At graduation she was awarded the John Gardner Fellowship. She was also the recipient of a Rhodes Scholarship and began her postgraduate study in 1995 at Lincoln College, Oxford. This made her the first openly gay or lesbian American to win an international Rhodes scholarship. In 2001, she earned a Doctor of Philosophy (DPhil) in politics from Oxford University. Her thesis is titled HIV/AIDS and Health Care Reform in British and American Prisons (supervisor: Dr Lucia Zedner). 10746. judithathome - 3/4/2013 9:32:39 PM Ingraham earned a bachelor's degree at Dartmouth College in 1985 and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree at the University of Virginia School of Law in 1991. 10747. Jenerator - 3/4/2013 9:41:55 PM I'll copy and paste, too. This is absolutely a stellar education and work resume:
"Ingraham earned a bachelor's degree at Dartmouth College in 1985 and a Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree at the University of Virginia School of Law in 1991. As a Dartmouth undergraduate, she was a staff member of the independent conservative newspaper, The Dartmouth Review. In her senior year, she was the newspaper's editor-in-chief,[3] its first female editor.[2]
...
In the late 1980s, Ingraham worked as a speechwriter in the Ronald Reagan administration for the Domestic Policy advisor. She also briefly served as editor of The Prospect, the magazine issued by Concerned Alumni of Princeton. After law school, in 1991, she served as a law clerk for Judge Ralph K. Winter, Jr., of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in New York and subsequently clerked for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. She then worked as an attorney at the New York-based law firm Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.[8]" 10748. Jenerator - 3/4/2013 9:43:26 PM So if we are to look at education and work experience, Ingraham is much more qualified for political commentary than Maddow.
But hey, Maddow is good for inflaming and polarizing.
I cannot stand her. 10749. judithathome - 3/4/2013 10:48:20 PM Well, according to you, she's doing a good job. :-)
I cannot stand many of the people on FOX...they are polarizing and, in my opinion, ill-informed.
But we, as the public, are lucky in that we can make choices of where and from whom we can listen to and value opinions. 10750. thoughtful - 3/5/2013 4:34:22 PM Maddow is terrific...smart, knowledgable, analytical and well spoken.
We need a new movement that will require both parties in Congress to take their jobs seriously...and that job is to serve the best interests of the country...it is not solely to get reelected..... 10751. alistairconnor - 3/5/2013 5:17:57 PM You need a Five Stars Movement (Grillo and co). These people are the real shit. Jexster would love them. 10752. iiibbb - 3/6/2013 3:03:09 AM I like Maddow. 10753. bhelpuri - 3/6/2013 2:10:49 PM Chavez dies + the response is huge waves of idiocy from almost all camps. Though I'd doubted it in his lifetime, it does appear the undeniably big-hearted character has achieved tremendous symbolic potency which will far overshadow his real-life achievements/failures. This does in fact place him in the company of his idol Bolivar (who similarly failed, spectacularly, at almost everything he assayed).
A reasonable assessment (written before he died). 10754. bhelpuri - 3/6/2013 2:13:20 PM Of course unseemly right-winger Yanqui cheering was to be expected when this happened, but what I find almost as offensive is the instant lionization of Chavez by a hugely disparate group of progressives/leftists/anti-colonials and their ilk, who also are busy edifying Chavez into what he most patently was not. Yes, Bolivar, I think El Comandante did in fact make himself into a Boivaran for our times. 10755. bhelpuri - 3/6/2013 3:38:54 PM I do not fully endorse this take on Chavez, but admire its ballsiness nonetheless: the biggest problem Venezuela faced during his rule was not that Chávez was authoritarian but that he wasn’t authoritarian enough. It wasn’t too much control that was the problem but too little.
|
