|
11325. Ms. No - 11/22/2013 7:37:22 AM When was the last time they had a majority in the Senate? I mean, it'll be in their favor the next time they've got 51% or more, so why are they bitching? 11326. judithathome - 11/22/2013 9:10:59 AM Because that is what they do. 11327. iiibbb - 11/22/2013 6:05:26 PM Payback--- Because two wrongs makes a right. 11328. Ms. No - 11/22/2013 6:13:50 PM Well, no, but three lefts do. 11329. judithathome - 11/23/2013 7:47:55 PM Ha!! 11330. judithathome - 11/26/2013 7:29:33 PM Supreme Court to Hear Hobby Lobby Birth Control Case
The chain has not challenged other methods agreed to by the federal government — contraceptive pills, diaphragms and other barrier methods — but it objects to the four specific methods on grounds they are comparable to abortion.
So, that is THEIR opinion...sounds like they are asking to be allowed to discriminate. And THIS court just might allow that.
This is the court that thinks corporations have the same rights as people do...now we get to see if the court thinks corporations actually have MORE. 11331. wabbit - 12/6/2013 1:49:05 AM RIP Nelson Mandela Nelson Mandela, the freedom fighter who emerged from 27 years in prison to become South Africa’s first elected black president and a global symbol of reconciliation, has died. He was 95. He died at 8:50 p.m. yesterday at his home in Houghton, Johannesburg, South African President Jacob Zuma said in a televised speech to the nation... 11332. robertjayb - 12/6/2013 2:02:50 AM I'm having a hard time thinking of great men, public men, in my lifetime.
Mandala heads my list. At random, briefly, on the fly, these names come to mind as possibles: Churchill. Eisenhower. Sadat. Golda Mier. Gorbachev. Thatcher? Ghandi. MLK. Ho Chi Minh.
Shouda, couda, wouda: LBJ. Nixon. Clinton. JFK. deGaulle?
Comments?
11333. arkymalarky - 12/6/2013 2:12:37 AM Hmmmm. Definitely Mandela. Hard to think of anyone else at the moment. 11334. robertjayb - 12/6/2013 5:17:16 AM Col. Pat Lang comments:
Nelson Mandela died today. He was one of the 20th Century's great men. Forebearing, and long suffering, he early turned from the path of violence. I have never heard anyone suggest that he was personally anything other than a man of great integrity and kindness.
Willem de Klerk was the last apartheid president of South Africa. He and Mandela were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993. De Klerk made the key decision to yield political power in South Africa to majority rule. He ordered Mandela released from prison and served as vice-president in the new regime. He still lives and is a lecturer across the world.
Two remarkable men. pl 11335. Wombat - 12/6/2013 5:29:38 AM Mandela was one of the few freedom fighters who knew how to take "yes" for an answer, who was pragmatic enough not to seek absolute power, and who knew when to step down. In my mind, there are only two others: George Washington (more accurately the collective called the founding fathers) and Michael Collins (Ireland). 11336. Jenerator - 12/10/2013 11:41:09 PM While I admire Mandela, I have questions about his relationship with Charles Taylor and his role in the ANC.
Power corrupts. 11337. judithathome - 12/13/2013 6:24:18 AM You know, that asshole "signer" at the Mandela ceremony yesterday is something that ought to be a wake-up call for everyone in the world...the fact that an admitted mentally-ill person was allowed to get THAT close to world leaders is absolutely INSANE. 11338. anomie - 12/13/2013 6:36:17 PM Whenever I think of great men, courage, gumption, sacrifice... I think of the "Tank Man" in Tiananmen Square. 11339. arkymalarky - 12/13/2013 7:36:47 PM I use that in class. 11340. judithathome - 12/22/2013 10:09:19 PM Okay, all this talk about Snowden's motives, etc. can stop now...he has offered to "trade" info to Brazil for "something".
In other words, he is bored with Russia and the beaches of Ipanema are looking a lot more inviting than the frozen pipes in his one room walkup in Moscow.
Some Call This Treason; HE Calls It "Help" 11341. alistairconnor - 12/23/2013 4:29:53 PM Judith, as I recall, you have spent a large part of your life on US military bases, with 24/7 surveillance and security.
The rest of us -- and especially non-Americans -- never made that choice. But we got the 24/7 surveillance anyway. 11342. judithathome - 12/23/2013 7:26:17 PM People in England have had cameras on them for decades...you act as though the US started this whole thing...
And for the record: I spent barely 10 years of the 30+ years I have been married to Keoni "in the military" and only lived one of those years on a military base. The rest I lived "off base", like the rest of the population in the countries where he served.
And trust me, I felt much safer in Japan and Germany (living off base) than I ever did...or DO...in the USA.
11343. alistairconnor - 12/24/2013 2:01:09 AM OK sorry for bringing up your private life, I was just trying to find a rationalization for why you're OK with the US spying on the entire world, its own citizens included... just a question of temperament I suppose.
Personally I think that if the USA survives as a democratic nation, Snowden will be revered as one of its saviours.
But you seem to have understood something about his motives that I have missed. Would you care to explain to me? 11344. Wombat - 12/24/2013 4:23:34 AM Snowden's first revelations on the level of surveillance that appears to be taking place in the US were shocking to some, and set off a needed discussion on whether the security of the United States needs this level of collection and intrusive data analysis.
His latest revelations are beginning to get into what are called "sources and methods" in intelspeak, in addition to blowing programs that are very much in the US (and its allies') interests.
It also seems that he planned his most recent job changes to try and get increased access to this information, as opposed to "stumbling onto" this "shocking" information. At best, he is trying to emulate Assange, at worst he is selling information to countries whose interests are not always the same as ours, and who have human rights and intrusive government policies that are considerably worse than ours.
|
