Welcome to the Mote!  

Religion and Philosophy

Host: Adam Selene

Are you a newbie?
Get an attitude.

Jump right in!

Mote Members: Log in Home
Post

Go to first message Go back 20 messages Messages 28216 - 28235 out of 29646 Go forward 20 messages Go to most recent message
28216. alistairConnor - 4/22/2006 3:57:24 PM

Convince me that it's immoral to have an intelligent and alive creature that is created artificially by man.

You misread me Adam, that's not my thesis. I don't have a problem with that (or if I do, it's an entirely different problem). What I want to outlaw is any blurring of the lines between human intelligence and created intelligence.

28217. PelleNilsson - 4/22/2006 4:26:26 PM

Alistair is clearly an Asimovian. How shall we label Adam? Would Philipdickian do?

28218. Adam Selene - 4/22/2006 5:56:16 PM

alistair, could you explain what you mean by blurring the lines? You mean by granting artifical intelligencses any kind of human rights?

Pelle, Adam is... well, consider the source of my namesake. :)

28219. Adam Selene - 4/22/2006 5:57:50 PM

Ulgine... well, I asked for it I guess. ;)

28220. PelleNilsson - 4/22/2006 6:07:19 PM

Aah, a Heinleinan!

28221. Adam Selene - 4/22/2006 7:00:10 PM

It's funny, I've been using this pseudonym for so long online that I sometimes forget that it's not my real name... ;) But, ya, Heinleinian it is. It's a perfect match on a couple of fronts... Adam Selene was a libertarian who helped lead the moon to independence from earth in The Moon is a Harsh Mistress. He was also a conscious machine and was treated as a fellow sentient being by his human friends, another theme I'm fond of in many respects. I've worked in artificial intelligence and neural networks professionally, and I only missed having a minor in psychology by a couple of credits when I earned my MS in Comp Sci, so I naturally have lots of theories about how thinking actually works and can be realized "artificially."

28222. alistairConnor - 4/22/2006 9:41:10 PM

Yes, I was hesitating between Heinlein-head and Philipdickhead...

28223. Adam Selene - 4/22/2006 9:51:49 PM

lol!

28224. judithathome - 4/22/2006 11:16:39 PM

doesn't seem that strange to me to love a machine

Me, neither...I love and adore my car.

28225. Ulgine Barrows - 4/23/2006 3:08:28 AM

I value my possessions but I don't love them....
refrigerator, PC, car, tiller, washing machine, microwave, vacuum, dryer, oven, shovel, iron, broom, needles...

28226. judithathome - 4/23/2006 4:51:30 AM

Whatever...I do love my car. And I think Arky even likes it.

28227. Ulgine Barrows - 4/23/2006 6:04:10 AM

O, I definitely covet a coworker's red zoomy Mustang, and there is another car in the lot I'd drive home, a Corvette. Actually there are 2 to choose from, one black and one red.

You might want to think about
Me, neither...I love and adore my car

28228. Ulgine Barrows - 4/23/2006 7:01:35 AM

$4/gal gas, I'm sure you like it well

28229. PelleNilsson - 4/23/2006 4:25:40 PM

Now I get it. Adam Selene = Silicon Man (adam is Hebrew for "man")

28230. Adam Selene - 4/23/2006 8:09:24 PM

Actually, Selene is the Greek moon godess. Adam being the first man in the old testament, and Adam Selene being the liberator of the moon colony - and also with Mycroft Holmes (the computers "real" name) having multisexual personnas, the name loosely represents "the first androgenous being of the moon." Sort of a tounge-in-cheek variation of the phrase "man in the moon."

See - I don't take my personnas lightly, do I? No I don't. Who asked me? You did. Oh, shut up.

28231. judithathome - 4/23/2006 8:17:38 PM

$4/gal gas, I'm sure you like it well

Well, what do you expect me to do, Ulgine? Sell my car and get a horse? Then hay would go up in price and I'd have to kill the horse.

The price of gas has nothing to do with my love for my car...no more so than the price of repairs on it.

28232. Adam Selene - 4/23/2006 8:31:09 PM

Americans (like me) are so spoiled with cheap gas. Europeans have being paying these prices for years. We want to find alternative fuels, but we don't generally want to reduce our consumption of gas first (e.g., via higher prices of gas or higher-cost technology to increase MPG) nor fund research (via gas taxes.)

Regardless, a $1 increase in gas is only a few hundred dollars a year - much less than the surcharge for a hybrid car. The problem is that we actually see the numbers flash by at the pump and that seems so much more real than a monthly car payment that includes the hybrid cost.

Besides... gas prices haven't even kept up with inflation.

28233. alistairConnor - 4/23/2006 9:33:15 PM

Interesting that this theme should show up in the Religion thread...

Car worship is going to come to a sticky end.

More precisely : it will be reserved for the well-off. The common herd will find themselves increasingly cut off from the object of desire, and ways of life that revolve around it will have to evolve or perish.

28234. resonance - 4/24/2006 3:09:29 AM

Great, now I've got an unfortunate Weed Atman allusion stuck in my head, that I won't make because no-one ever gets my Pynchon references.

I'd agree with Alistair -- well, I think I would, I don't know really what all he means by 'car worship' -- except, well, no, I don't really, regardless. Cars won't be reserved for the well-off because a) automobiles do not necessarily need to run on gasoline b) people make a lot of money selling cars and c) people make a lot of money because other people can get in their car and go drive someplace to spend it.

I think the triune forces of scientific advance, market pressure and scarcity of resource will push society eventually to a point where, when it looks back, our current use of the automobile will seem shamelessly profligate and horribly inefficient.

But I don't really see cars being pushed out of the reach of the majority of first-worlders until a) nanotechnology becomes widespread and b) so does AI, simply because I think you need those two things available if green Alistair-style locales are going to be truly self-sustaining in the technological age. As long as they are not, there will be a lot of pressure for people to be mobile over fair distances -- while automobiles might be priced out of the reach of some, economically it makes no sense for them to be a tool accessible by a privileged few.

28235. Adam Selene - 4/24/2006 3:22:20 AM

It will be interesting to see what China does re: personal cars vs. mass transport vs. work at home.
Given a command economy - I'd build monorails and office/condo buildings to see which worked better/faster.

Go to first message Go back 20 messages Messages 28216 - 28235 out of 29646 Go forward 20 messages Go to most recent message
Home
Back to the Top
Posts/page

Religion and Philosophy

You can't post until you register. Come on, you'll never regret it. Join up!