|
46534. arkymalarky - 9/25/2016 8:48:47 PM She seems to think that posting from ant alt right tabloid British side is somehow more credible than the American sites that spew this stuff all the time. 46535. arkymalarky - 9/25/2016 9:28:16 PM I think Hillary Clinton's best ad strategy would be to focus on her with children, and seeing pictures of her with kids just puts a smile on your face automatically; also her promotion of women's rights, starting with her statements that women's rights are human rights. I think they ought to really hone in on her strengths and not try to focus on what a nut job Trump is. Everyone knows what a nut job he is. But they need to know is why they should vote for her, and not in contrast to him but as who she is. 46536. arkymalarky - 9/26/2016 12:16:37 AM Wow, I can't believe how quickly she took my advice! Commercial I just saw with her going from the earliest to now on children was the best I've seen yet. 46537. winstonsmith - 9/26/2016 6:32:17 AM I were Clinton, I would be tempted to say something like this right out of the gate:
As you may know, the Trump caimaign has been pressuring the moderators to not fact check the debates and I just want to say, please, moderators, media and everyone at home, please fact check everything Donald and I say. 46538. arkymalarky - 9/26/2016 1:11:41 PM Agree 46539. iiibbb - 9/26/2016 6:00:01 PM Message # 46527
Data says the under 30 crowd is skeptical of Clinton. Facebook feed is populated by a variety of under-30's and it has been voiced more than once by artsy-fartsy friends of friends (read low-information voters).
These people were between 6 and 12 when Bush was last elected and between 2 and 8 when Nadir was in play.
So...
...no I'll admit I'm a little bit of a hypocrite because I did vote for Bush in 2000 because I was all Clinton fatigued...
But... I also think the stakes are much much higher than they were then given the makeup of Congress and other factors.
46540. judithathome - 9/26/2016 9:43:15 PM I heard that the only network that will be running a fact check crawl on both candidates at the bottom of the stage will be Bloomberg. 46541. judithathome - 9/26/2016 9:46:29 PM Not STAGE....SCREEN. sheesh....
My only excuse is Kellyanne Conway was yakking on the TV as I typed that...her husband better hope she never committs adultry because she would be able to misdirect his charges to the point he would come out of court thinking HE did the deed...WITH Hillary Clinton! 46542. judithathome - 9/27/2016 5:47:45 PM No contest last night...Hillary won the debate and looked more presidential than that grimacing, inarticulate sniffling buffoon. 46543. judithathome - 9/27/2016 9:33:38 PM Long read but well worth it by Dan Rather...
"Ladies and gentlemen, whatever civility once existed in our politics is tonight officially dead. Never in the history of televised debates have we witnessed such a show. And that’s what the Donald wanted. A show. He got it, but will he be seen as the hero or the villain?
If you are a fan of Hillary Clinton, I suspect you are thrilled with her poised and confident performance. Perhaps her crowning line was “I prepared for this debate and I'm prepared to be President”. If you are a fan of Donald Trump, his quarrelsome, no-holds-barred approach, often facts be damned, will likely in turn have thrilled you. The question is what does everybody else watching think and how many impressionable voters remain?
Taking a snapshot of the debate stage this evening, two candidates behind podiums, each representing one of the major political parties, it would seem to be the latest chapter in our quadrennial dance with democracy. But experiencing the event, in sound and motion, it was of course anything but.
46544. judithathome - 9/27/2016 9:34:05 PM (con't)
From the very beginning, the body language tonight was striking. HIllary Clinton, the first woman ever to be on this stage was calm and substantive. Donald Trump interrupted often and slouched and sneered as he turned to address her. This is what Trump’s fans like about him, playing the alpha male at all costs. Clinton seemed completely unflustered, which is what her fans love about her. How this all plays to the majority of viewers and voters at home will be in the eyes of the beholder.
But I was surprised by how much this man who has made so much of the means of television spent not looking into the camera, but preoccupied with his adversary. Trump came across as amped, a pacing tiger ready to pounce on every answer. His Interruptions suggests little regard to the rules. He’s itching for a fight...Wants to swing wildly.
At one point early in the debate Clinton, after multiple factually questionable assertions by Trump said, "I have a feeling by the end of this debate I'll be blamed for everything that ever happened," Clinton said. Trump replied, “Why not?” That about summed it up.
Clinton clearly wanted to get under Trump’s skin. She attacked him for getting a hefty amount of money from his dad, challenging the narrative that he was a self-made man. And then attacking his business practices. The headline she was aiming for is Donald the Deadbeat. And then on the issue of Trump’s unreleased tax returns, when Clinton says that was because he may not have paid any taxes, Trump responded, “that makes me smart.” Expect to hear more about this.
Clinton was clearly the policy expert, nimbly jumping from topic to topic, policy to policy. But she was also much more able to paint a big picture than I have seen in times past. I thought she was particularly effective on the issue of race and especially the birther lie against President Obama. She had the facts on her side, but also it was an effective appeal to fire up her base.
46545. judithathome - 10/2/2016 12:33:29 AM OMG....this is something I had never heard before...if it is true, this country is in DEEP trouble because this man is even
being considered as President of our country! Trump Accused of Spousal Rape
"(It’s not uncommon for court files to go missing.)"
Ha! No shit...especially TRUMP'S! 46546. arkymalarky - 10/2/2016 1:48:00 AM TPM has been talking about that for a while. A lot of stuff is coming out about him and it's not going to stop between now and election day. 46547. arkymalarky - 10/2/2016 2:09:46 AM I was thinking we might get Pepe's take on all this, but apparently not. 46548. arkymalarky - 10/2/2016 3:02:20 PM It's gonna rain hard on trump today. 46549. judithathome - 10/2/2016 7:40:32 PM Pepe the Frog?? I thought he was in the tank for Trump...;-) 46550. judithathome - 10/2/2016 7:48:59 PM Here's the Article About Trump Not Paying Taxes...No Wonder He Won't Let Us see His Tax Returns Voluntarily!
Donald J. Trump declared a $916 million loss on his 1995 income tax returns, a tax deduction so substantial it could have allowed him to legally avoid paying any federal income taxes for up to 18 years, records obtained by The New York Times show.
The 1995 tax records, never before disclosed, reveal the extraordinary tax benefits that Mr. Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, derived from the financial wreckage he left behind in the early 1990s through mismanagement of three Atlantic City casinos, his ill-fated foray into the airline business and his ill-timed purchase of the Plaza Hotel in Manhattan.
Tax experts hired by The Times to analyze Mr. Trump’s 1995 records said that tax rules especially advantageous to wealthy filers would have allowed Mr. Trump to use his $916 million loss to cancel out an equivalent amount of taxable income over an 18-year period.
The $916 million loss certainly could have eliminated any federal income taxes Mr. Trump otherwise would have owed on the $50,000 to $100,000 he was paid for each episode of “The Apprentice,” or the roughly $45 million he was paid between 1995 and 2009 when he was chairman or chief executive of the publicly traded company he created to assume ownership of his troubled Atlantic City casinos. Ordinary investors in the new company, meanwhile, saw the value of their shares plunge to 17 cents from $35.50, while scores of contractors went unpaid for work on Mr. Trump’s casinos and casino bondholders received pennies on the dollar.
“He has a vast benefit from his destruction” in the early 1990s, said one of the experts, Joel Rosenfeld, an assistant professor at New York University’s Schack Institute of Real Estate. Mr. Rosenfeld offered this description of what he would advise a client who came to him with a tax return like Mr. Trump’s: “Do you realize you can create $916 million in income without paying a nickel in taxes?”
Mr. Trump declined to comment on the documents. Instead, the campaign released a statement that neither challenged nor confirmed the $916 million loss.
46551. judithathome - 10/2/2016 7:53:01 PM And his response to this? Poor people get out of paying taxes all the time through loopholes.
Really? Like the loopholes of not having jobs and/or being
poor? Maybe that's why he thinks the minimum wage is too high...he's just trying to save people from higher taxes.... 46552. arkymalarky - 10/2/2016 8:52:36 PM He is. He-she posts here occasionally. 46553. arkymalarky - 10/6/2016 12:14:38 AM Booooo Mark Halperin. I just had to get that out of my system. I'm just change the channel otherwise, but this close to the election I can't seem to manage that.
|
