|
7245. wonkers2 - 1/16/2008 10:57:17 PM Also, I mostly retract my post about MRSA and gays. I just heard a report on NPR about concern over MRSA spreading in San Francisco and other big cities in the gay community and others. 7246. wonkers2 - 1/16/2008 11:18:46 PM However, I wonder why you and so many in the lunatic conservative community are so preoccupied with gay health issues. You don't seem to be sincerely "concerned" about it as you might be about Alzheimer's or whooping cough among children or some other epidemic? You and others of your ilk hardly miss an opportunity to take a poke at gays and lesbians. Your carping is about gays is quite unbecoming and casts doubt on your status as an educated, rational and tolerant indivudual. 7247. concerned - 1/17/2008 2:00:24 AM However, I wonder why you and so many in the (unwarranted insult) conservative community are so preoccupied with gay health issues.
Since you're a purportedly rational, thinking individual, I wonder at your apparent ingenuousness here.
The concern here is that sound medical practices are being completely disregarded, or treated as a poor second in importance to frivolous narrowly defined social agendas.
Either you give a fuck about the general well being of society's health or you don't. People who avert their heads regarding STDs when gays are involved because of PC considerations don't, AFAIC.
The gay part of the equation is only a relatively minor part of the whole picture, but should not be selectively ignored.
7248. wonkers2 - 1/17/2008 4:24:33 AM Let's be honest here. You were'nt expressing concern about the "general well being of society's health." You were just being a right wing gay baiter in the manner of Jerry Falwell, et al. You would be more credible if you had ever expressed concern about a non-gay-related health concern. Your concern for gay health is really impressive. 7249. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:00:52 AM I'm being more honest than you can probably handle, wonkers. The problem wrt gay health pales in comparison to that of the rights of unborn persons which your side unanimously rejects.
Your only chance to regain credibility with me on this matter is to concede the above forthwith. 7250. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:09:34 AM The attitude of the Left regarding gay health and the rights of the unborn is completely explicable by the political rubric of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease".
Thusly this alone gives me the moral high ground. 7251. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:17:12 AM and I realized my mind worked on a much more complex plane that did his...
No, it just means that you're interested in analyzing others' behavior patterns. It would be an egregious mistake to jump to the assumption that you've mastered anything because of this interest or that it lends you an aura of 'superiority'. 7252. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:24:31 AM Any rational analysis of others' behavior driven by the motivation of wanting to be noticed and liked is one of the things that makes the female sex lovable to me. 7253. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:27:24 AM Any rational analysis of others' behavior driven by the motivation of wanting to be noticed and liked is one of the things that makes the female sex lovable to me. 7254. wonkers2 - 1/17/2008 5:12:16 PM Selectively ignored? Your selective focusing on gay health issues reveals you for what you are. A bigoted right wing jerk-off. I would worry a lot if I "regained credibility" with you. 7255. concerned - 1/17/2008 6:36:31 PM Wonkers -
Don't try laying your guilt on me because your LW policies have gotten tens of millions of people needlessly killed. 7256. thoughtful - 1/17/2008 6:37:42 PM Seems to me there are a lot of very homophobic folks who turn out to be gay. Their homophobia comes from fighting their own internal wars against their own feelings. Denial runs high. Larry Craig anyone?
As Dirty Harry said, "It's what people know about themselves that makes them afraid." 7257. concerned - 1/17/2008 7:27:11 PM Looks like I stirred up a hornets' nest here.
Well, back to the Lefties' regularly scheduled suppression of rational public health policy discussion, I guess. Millions of people die because of their policies - naturally they don't want to talk about it. IAC, I'm bored with their knee jerk accusations and name calling. 7258. wonkers2 - 1/17/2008 7:59:17 PM You would be well advised to let gay Americans and the medical profession worry about their health issues. Your motivation has nothing to do with concern about health issues and plenty to do with your right wing politics. Or you might consider focusing on prenatal care or the lack of medical care for poor children. 7259. concerned - 1/17/2008 8:09:24 PM Wonkers -
I think gay americans and the medical profession have done an egregiously negligent and completely reprehensible job wrt their health issues (basically nothing proactive at all) and tens of millions of people have needlessly died as a result. That's all there is to that, whether you personally like it or not.
Your attempt to try to dictate to me what you believe my motivation is completely uninformed, and furthermore, you are completely wrong in your assumption. However, it is entirely possible you are describing your own attitude here.
7260. wonkers2 - 1/17/2008 9:09:08 PM I'm not dictating anything to you. I'm simply stating the what is obvious to anyone familiar with you and your usual crap. 7261. judithathome - 1/18/2008 1:39:04 AM The problem wrt gay health pales in comparison to that of the rights of unborn persons which your side unanimously rejects.
Oh give me an effin' break...you and your ilk only care about the "unborn" in utero...after they are born, you couldn't care less. Especially if they turn out to be "gay".
It would be an egregious mistake to jump to the assumption that you've mastered anything because of this interest or that it lends you an aura of 'superiority'.
Oh please...I was well-read and experienced woman of 40 and he was 23 years old and a steel worker who barely finished high school. Do you honestly think I was less intelligent than he? The only thing lending me an aura of superiority was the fact I did possess a superior intelligence to this young man...which mattered not one whit to me (or him!) at the time.
You may not understand this and it doesn't surprise me in the least that you don't, never having experienced anything remotely like it, I'm sure.
7262. concerned - 1/18/2008 6:24:47 PM You may very well be more intelligent in fact than this person you mention.
Along with my great intelligence goes the great modesty to admit that I don't always have the 'answer' to everything:) 7263. concerned - 1/18/2008 6:26:00 PM I'm not accusing you of assuming you have the 'answer', btw. I'm admitting I maybe was a bit hasty in posting. 7264. alistairconnor - 1/18/2008 6:29:53 PM I think you're getting old, Con... that was the closest thing to an apology I've ever seen you post.
|
