|
7756. alistairConnor - 10/29/2009 1:32:26 AM Sorry, that was a bit of a rant. I'm always horrified how even the best-intentioned Americans can be so incredibly insular. The whole world is buzzing with the Copenhagen business, and it just doesn't seem to register.
Perhaps it's the Bush backlash I have feared : functional isolationism. It won't wash. The US has global responsibilities. 7757. wabbit - 10/30/2009 1:11:02 AM I don't know that I'm insular so much as sick and tired of the US being blamed for the failure of every piece of paper that comes through the UN. For a bunch of folks who whine about how the US bullies others, I don't see anyone stepping up to the plate to take over. Everyone loves it when the US leadership does things their way, but let us cross a line, ANY line, and everything that is wrong is our fault. So long as the US is responsible, everyone else is able to take credit when things go well while remaining free from accepting the responsibility when it all falls apart.
Hey, here's a thought. Let's move the UN out of NYC and into Paris, or Tel Aviv, or Hamburg, or Beijing. Let someone else take a turn at being the host country. Have fun with that little bit of financial and legal responsibility.
As for global responsibilities, don't others also share those? Why is it that when the US declines, others seem relieved and jump to follow suit and then blame the lack of US leadership. Talk about something that won't wash.
That said, don't get me started on eight years of Bushism.
Maybe all of that rant belongs in the International thread.
I'm not saying we shouldn't get with the program here. We've lost years, decades, that should have been forcing the hand of big oil and auto manufacturers. There is a whole lot we should be doing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Hell, Jimmy Carter was on track back in the 1970's to do exactly that. I'd love to see us tell OPEC to piss off, stop burning coal, to have electric cars (again - why they were all recalled and crushed is a whole 'nuther story), etc. But as for the rest of the world waiting for us to "lead"? YOU lead. 7758. alistairconnor - 10/30/2009 4:25:26 PM Sorry, there is no "you".
Europe does not have its shit together. We're trying to cobble something laboriously together so that the former Soviet bloc EU members get carbon credit for having closed down their dirty old industries when their economies collapsed in the 80s/90s. The EU, meaning the richer Euro countries, are willing to pay to help the poor and emerging nations to reduce their GHG production, but our house has to be in order too.
In order to get significant international agreements, you need critical mass, and you need leadership. The US has critical mass all on its own. Europe ought to have that capability, but won't for at least another couple of decades. The Bush era has shown that NO multilateral agreements can be negotiated as long as the US is not on board. Hence, the collapse of the Doha round of the WTO, and the complete absence of progress on Kyoto. This is what Bush wanted - he was against the principle of multilateralism, and he succeeded in fucking it up, not merely for the US, but for everyone. If Americans now consider that the US now has no leadership role, and does not even have to come to the table to negotiate in good faith, then perhaps that's W's final victory, and legacy. I'll bet it makes him chuckle now.
OK, none of you voted for Bush. That's not the point. The US can't just say sorry guys and walk out of Iraq and Afghanistan. It's the same with climate negotiations. Having prevented any progress in the past eight years, the US has a moral responsibility to repair some of that damage. China, India, Brazil, Europe are all coming to the table with specific propositions. It looks like the US is coming to the table empty-handed, since Congress hasn't got its shit together to pass enabling legislation. That's a historic opportunity missed. 7759. wabbit - 10/30/2009 7:43:54 PM I still don't see how the US *prevented* anyone else from doing what they could about climate change. Brazil managed to start doing something about its horrendous air pollution problem some time ago. Still, I suppose it's useful that the US is there to take the blame, but I'm not going to beat a dead horse.
I don't think we'll be abandoning Afghanistan, but the shrub sure screwed the pooch there.
We also need to get our house in order, the EU doesn't have a monopoly on that problem. We have the potential for leadership, but you aren't hearing the hew and cry daily about how Obama should go back to Kenya where he was born. A lot of people are doing what they can to ensure the failure of this administration - the same group that torpedoed any progress on GHG. Never underestimate the willingness of people to be gullible to avoid thinking for themselves.
Don't count on the US's critical mass, or financial backing. We've got our own problems, too. 7760. alistairconnor - 11/3/2009 11:36:52 PM Merkel prods U.S. on global warming
The part I like is in the second half of the article, about the quibbling and squabbling of the Senate committee. These people are working for you. 7761. alistairconnor - 11/9/2009 4:44:23 PM And they're working hard :
U.S. Senate panel approves Democratic climate bill
But fear not : the planet is in no danger of being saved, just yet.
"This bill will send energy costs racing upward and put the brakes on any hope of economic recovery," said Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, a Republican. "Once the American public starts paying for these special interests, Democrats may not have much to hope for in future elections either." 7762. alistairconnor - 11/23/2009 7:47:09 PM So, Microsoft and Murdoch (mmm, M&Ms!) want to take us back to the days of walled-off internet? The good old days of AOL, or, even better, Compuserve? 7763. alistairconnor - 11/23/2009 7:48:19 PM Murdoch wants to yank his papers off Yahoo. Microsoft is prepared to pay for the privilege of indexing them.
I wouldn't read the Sun, or the WSJ, if you paid me. 7764. TheWizardOfWhimsy - 11/23/2009 11:28:08 PM Murdoch is insane and the biggest media danger on this planet. He's fueling all of the current crop of demagogues while looking for a potential stealth-fascist who can control the ever increasing ignorant and angry mob. Stormy and worrisome times. 7765. arkymalarky - 11/25/2009 6:07:08 PM I hope it kills his media empire off. Now that his bullshit won't be free, maybe people will read less of it. The mob's anger anbd ignorance are increasing, but its numbers are shrinking fast--which is part of why they've turned up the volume. Good thing, since Dems don't seem able to find their butts with both hands right now. When the DNC calls asking for money I give them all I can afford or care to donate: advice. I've been generous with that lately. 7766. TheWizardOfWhimsy - 12/1/2009 8:21:36 AM If you stare at this long enough the yellow dots will disappear.
 7767. alistairConnor - 12/5/2009 2:14:46 PM Hope for the planet? Obama seems to think so
He's switched his visit to Copenhagen from the 9th, at the beginning of the conference, to the end, when at least 100 heads of state will be present.
That's a sure sign that he thinks his presence can make an impact, and that a meaningful accord will emerge.
They won't nail down the details of a binding treaty, but if they kick-start a funding mechanism for clean development for the third world, that will be enough in the meantime. 7768. arkymalarky - 1/14/2010 2:15:47 AM Anyone know why I can't get a dos game to run on my computer? Did some XP update block that or something? 7769. alistairConnor - 1/14/2010 12:12:39 PM You probably have to create a shortcut to it and play with the compatibility properties of the shortcut. May or may not work! 7770. arkymalarky - 1/15/2010 2:14:11 AM Thanks, I'll try that! 7771. iiibbb - 1/18/2010 7:42:17 PM If you still have trouble, there's a program out there called DOSBOX at dosbox.com 7772. arkymalarky - 1/19/2010 5:59:46 AM Thanks! It wasn't working so far. It works on my old xp laptop. This one is xp too. 7773. TheWizardOfWhimsy - 1/20/2010 7:32:10 AM Jesus, not one response to the optical illusion, above. If this doesn't get a response, you folks are without wonder.
7774. alistairConnor - 1/20/2010 12:45:06 PM Hey Wiz, I loved the dots... but my tired old eyes play tricks on me these days even without prompting!
I'm forbidden to see whatever you posted today, here at work (they firewall out all the common timewasting sites... luckily my timewasting tastes are so eclectic, this is only a mild handicap for me), but will appreciate later! 7775. TheWizardOfWhimsy - 1/20/2010 10:10:38 PM Well here's the URL, Alistair and it's not to be missed because it gives the viewer such a palpable sense of the distances inherent in our universe. It's a remarkable and brilliant visual and well worth viewing over and over.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17jymDn0W6U
|
