|
9522. bhelpuri - 7/1/2013 2:18:55 PM I left the USA on the day after Dubya was re-elected, which was awesome timing. Couple months later I liquidated from almost all US assets, shifted my funds from dollars to rupees, and invested almost everything in Asia markets + real estate. Returns went from 10-12% to 70-80%. But right now happens to be a different ballgame, and some of my gains being wiped out by currency woes. The US now looks an attractive bargain in many ways - Europe too. In the next few years (as my kids filter to college) I will venture back... 9523. alistairconnor - 7/1/2013 3:46:47 PM Yes, there are times and places for bringing up children. 9524. arkymalarky - 7/1/2013 8:31:49 PM any speculation on where things are headed in Egypt? 9525. arkymalarky - 7/1/2013 8:32:45 PM Oh, and I just read at TPM that Soledad O'Brien is going to work for al Jazeera America. 9526. arkymalarky - 7/1/2013 8:33:58 PM and where is Wombat? I'm interested in his take on what's happening right now. 9527. judithathome - 7/1/2013 8:38:46 PM Al Jazeera owns Current TV and has some of the best political reporting going. I watch two shows from there 4 nights a week: The War Room with Michael Shure and Viewpoint with John Fugelsang. Both are very good and they have geusts that aren't the "usual suspects" doing the rotation from cable TV 9528. judithathome - 7/1/2013 8:39:06 PM ..cable TV news. 9529. bhelpuri - 7/2/2013 4:28:42 AM Egypt seems set for a leadership change , which is another victory for the mass demonstrations that have guided change in that country the past year. It's a big deal, a stunning reversal for the Muslim Brotherhood after it had played all its cards right to get into power in the first place.
But will merely replacing Morsi or the leadership make any difference? I suspect that Egypt, like Turkey, like Iran and several other countries in the region are going to have a very difficult time coping with the demands, needs and aspirations of their populations for at least a decade to come. We are likely to see entrenched Occupy-type demonstrations, and a lot of unexpected turnover in the top echelons of leadership including regime changes. 9530. judithathome - 7/2/2013 5:30:25 AM The scenes of the demonstrations look amazing.
Something like that in this country would never happen...apathy rules the day. 9531. bhelpuri - 7/2/2013 7:11:24 AM I have been thinking about that question the past few weeks. In many other countries - including European ones - I think revelation of massive surveillance on its own population would have resulted in angry mass demonstrations, and quite possible a resignation of the chief executive in fairly short order.
But nothing like that is likely in the US, where the companies colluding in the surveillance all experienced slight rises in stock prices - not a mass exodus - and where the vast majority of people have clearly demonstrated they really don't care about the issue at all.
Some of this is clearly the issue itself - privacy is nowhere nearly as valued as it once was - and also the continued post 9/11 atmosphere makes it easy for the government to sell the public such snooping is necessary to prevent terrorist acts.
But another part really is the dumbed-down, disengaged and distracted nature of the contemporary American electorate.
Marches and demonstrations and dissent all require a level of commitment that is hard to detect almost anywhere but the far fringes of the US polity now. The existing system has become so all-powerful and entrenched that it is pretty much impervious to any threat of correction or significant change. Obama's regime has been a perfect illustration of this, and I think the message has now strongly been internalized in young Americans that you can't change the bedrock of the socio-economic realities of the country except in superficial, mostly symbolic ways (gay marriage, a mixed-race man in the White House, a Latina on the Supreme Court) etc.
In my opinion this is a dangerous transition period for American democracy, with signs not very positive for its future. 9532. bhelpuri - 7/2/2013 1:48:02 PM 
9533. bhelpuri - 7/2/2013 1:52:44 PM FYI, that is the Muslim Brotherhood logo. Extraordinary failure in politics in just a few short months... 9534. vonKreedon - 7/2/2013 5:52:05 PM As Bhel says, the failure of US citizens to respond to the ongoing revelations about government surveillance, political IRS scrutiny, and lying about same is really depressing. I'm particularly stunned that Clapper still has a job as DNI after baldly lying to the Senate in response to a question from Sen. Wyden, answer that both Clapper and Wyden knew at the time to be a lie.
9535. Wombat - 7/3/2013 12:58:29 AM Boy, go away for a few weeks and miss the return of Pincher Martin. I've always respected his debating skills (compared to Concerned and Acey, anyway). Like many, he seems to have become embittered.
With the advent of the Internet and the propagation of sites such as facebook, most Americans have become complicit in the loss of their privacy. For those who are upset with the NSA holding telephone metadata with the capacity to access internet data, are you as concerned with private entities holding the same data and using it with no oversight or accountability for their own ends?
Updating privacy and surveillance legislation to reflect the massive increase and propagation of personal information would be a good thing (although unlikely to happen, since one political party seems to have degenerated to Concerned-like poo-flinging as their political strategy).
So too would be a debate on whether the risks of a major terrorist incident outweighs costs to privacy and potential for abuse. That too is unlikely to happen any time soon. 9536. vonKreedon - 7/3/2013 1:02:32 AM The Snowden affair surfaced a chilling phrase that I'm afraid neatly summarizes our danger: Turnkey Tyranny.
And another thing, when did The Mote implement spell checking? 9537. Wombat - 7/3/2013 1:19:02 AM It's only "tyranny" if the government actually abuses its legislatively-arrived-at capability (which it probably will at some point). Until then we have the soft tyranny of cookies and other forms of consumer data tracking, car rental agencies using GPS data, etc. 9538. vonKreedon - 7/3/2013 2:26:02 AM Yes, thus its "turnkey" nature. 9539. arkymalarky - 7/3/2013 2:39:01 AM as a long time employee of the NSA as a cryptanalyst, my dad had an interesting take on the whole situation. So, interestingly, did Wanda Sykes, who spoke about her employment with NSA on Jay Leno. Dad's point was that the NSA has always gathered the maximum amount of information they possibly could, and that it's kind of the nature of the beast--that it's been called No Such Agency virtually from its inception. Wanda Sykes had no support for Snowden.
I've been concerned about corporate control and corporate contracts for a long time before this came about. The corporatization of almost everything and the increased privatization of crucial government services is IMO the most dangerous threat to the US. But who protests that? It took decades of repression and a host of converging factors to result in the recent revolutions and the new governments are going to be vulnerable. But Americans day to day enjoy free speech and a sense of opportunity and control of their own destinies. It's the boiling frog here. Arkansas' legislature is brought to us by the Koch brothers and IMO Citizens United is just one aspect of a huge crisis. And I don't think crisis is hyperbole. 9540. arkymalarky - 7/3/2013 2:40:53 AM Vk the spell check is probably coming from your browser. My spelling sure isn't being checked. 9541. arkymalarky - 7/3/2013 2:53:09 AM as a long time employee of the NSA as a cryptanalyst, my dad had an interesting take on the whole situation. So, interestingly, did Wanda Sykes, who spoke about her employment with NSA on Jay Leno. Dad's point was that the NSA has always gathered the maximum amount of information they possibly could, and that it's kind of the nature of the beast--that it's been called No Such Agency virtually from its inception. Wanda Sykes had no support for Snowden.
I've been concerned about corporate control and corporate contracts for a long time before this came about. The corporatization of almost everything and the increased privatization of crucial government services is IMO the most dangerous threat to the US. But who protests that? It took decades of repression and a host of converging factors to result in the recent revolutions and the new governments are going to be vulnerable. But Americans day to day enjoy free speech and a sense of opportunity and control of their own destinies. It's the boiling frog here. Arkansas' legislature is brought to us by the Koch brothers and IMO Citizens United is just one aspect of a huge crisis. And I don't think crisis is hyperbole.
|
