American media purposefully avoiding, but the fact is the shit has hit the fan worldwide after the continuing revelations from this rather amazing whistleblower. I am among those who find his actions heroic.9561. Wombat - 7/4/2013 4:45:05 PM
Most countries would rather continue to have a positive relationship with the United States, and not do things that would needlessly affect those relationships.
Had Bhelpuri's "hero" stayed in the US to take his legal lumps, he would have a better case for both whistleblowing and "martyrdom." Instead he put himself in the hands of not one but two countries' intelligence services. The only sensible member of the Snowdon family is his father, who is trying to negotiate a way for his son to return. In this, he is opposed by Wikileaks, which of course has its own agenda, one which apparently prefers to see Snowdon as a man without a country.
9562. arkymalarky - 7/4/2013 6:15:31 PM
As someone who generally thinks Anonymous is a good thing and Aaron Schwartz was right, I tend to agree with Wombat here. I feel the same way about Manning and Assange. But part of the issue IMO is also carelessness and even sloppiness on the part of the government art its hiring, security of info within and among its ranks, and a lack of clarity as to how that security relates to its goals and missions. There are tech whizzes who are certainly talented enough to drop out of high school and contract out as government employees making six figures. But are they the best hires on the basis of their tech talent? Or should there at least be a different set of security policies so as not to miss out on top talent but not be as vulnerable? There are other concerns that the Snowden incident reveals which need to be addressed, whether people agree with him or not.
9563. arkymalarky - 7/4/2013 6:17:24 PM
Wrt, not art
9564. judithathome - 7/4/2013 7:07:42 PM
American media purposefully avoiding,
Since your link didn't work, I can only assume you are referring to the Bolivian President's plane being denied air space over Europe.
American media didn't avoid it at all...at least not the cable TV news stations I watch.
9565. judithathome - 7/4/2013 7:08:38 PM
Clarification: your link didn't work for me
9566. Wombat - 7/4/2013 7:31:19 PM
As someone who has his share of issues with security clearances, I agree, Arky.
9567. vonKreedon - 7/4/2013 8:26:30 PM
Yeah, I'm with Wombat and Judith wrt Snowden. He should have stayed in the US and certainly shouldn't have placed himself and his intel in the hands of the Chinese and Russians.
9568. judithathome - 7/4/2013 9:46:11 PM
Personally, I think this guy has visions of grandeur about himself. And they are sorely misplaced.
He could have gone a much more sane route in exposing what he considers to be criminal behavior in the government.
He also should have had a plan in mind for what would be coming down on his head after he blew the whistle. For him to whine about being a man without a country and blaming the President for it is ludicrous...he chose this path...the fact it's full of ruts and leading nowhere is on him, no one else.
His father allegedly made some remark about his son exposing "the road to tyranny" taking place in this country...funny that he and his son never complained about the tyrannical actions of the former administration. (That we know of, anyhow.)
9569. vonKreedon - 7/4/2013 11:17:13 PM
Yeah, I'm with Wombat and Judith wrt Snowden. He should have stayed in the US and certainly shouldn't have placed himself and his intel in the hands of the Chinese and Russians.
9570. Trillium - 7/5/2013 6:11:58 AM
Who knows what was the final straw for Snowden? what did he witness, that fixed his intentions to speak out (and he may not be through with leaking).
There is someone else (General Cartwright) targeted for revealing information about a virus (stuxnet) that wrecks centrifuges, and which has escaped out onto the Internet. Snowden commented that computer hacking can wreck not only military equipment, but also hospital equipment and other critical devices.
Earlier a poster commented about our reliance on computers, and what happens when they malfunction? In a world bristling with high tech weaponry and support systems, goofs and/or malfunctions could have unimaginable consequences that we aren't prepared for.
I think we are too complacent and trusting in "authority". "Authorities" are just other fallible people, wielding enormous power. Accidents will happen, and meanwhile the public (and private?) discussions are pitiful, consisting mostly of partisan bickering, distortions, lying, and coverups.
9571. judithathome - 7/5/2013 6:30:23 AM
Well, you might have a point...but who granted those in "authority" the ability to do these things? They were voted in, some of them, and we all bear the brunt of THAT.
9572. Trillium - 7/5/2013 5:46:26 PM
Judith, we do vote for some of our leaders. On the other hand, there is a large component of un-voted leadership that goes mostly unexamined.
When I lived in New York City as a young woman, at some point I became aware that organized crime has a huge influence in the unofficial governance of the city. It wasn't just Italian mafia; there were other factions which also ruled by force, under the radar. Many of them were ethnic organizations (Russian, Asian, Colombian etc.) Ever so often the news would mention these groups, usually in a non-specific way.
After coming across a number of incidents involving the power of these groups (in housing, in recycling/garbage collection, etc.) I began to understand how "real" power, led by organized strongmen willing to use violence, forces decisions beyond the publicized façade of government.
Educated people and college professors used to crack jokes about "good ole boy" networks in the South. There's a lot more that goes on, well beyond the South, without commentary.
9573. judithathome - 7/5/2013 5:51:23 PM
Of course there is...I just wish more people would admit it happens from both sides of the political spectrum.
